• toppling ladder
    Loyola at AALS 2015

    Over a dozen Loyola faculty presented papers and chaired sections at this year’s AALS meeting.  Papers and panels included Ellen Aprill, The Latest Installment of the Section 501(c)(4) Saga, Justin Hughes, IP in DC: The Nuts, Bolts, and Duct Tape of Reform, Kevin Lapp, Databasing Delinquency, Laurie Levenson, Reprioritizing Accuracy as the Primary Goal of the Criminal Justice process, and Elizabeth Pollman (with Margaret Blair), The Derivative Nature of Corporate Constitutional Rights.

  • A Theory of Performance-Based Consumer Law

    Professor Lauren Willis has just released this innovative article, Performance-Based Consumer Law, forthcoming in the University of Chicago Law Review.  Her approach would align the interests of firms and regulators by switching to "consumer performance" standards rather than current disclosure or design requirements.  In effect, firms would be rewarded for actual consumer comprehension and/or when consumers actually use products in suitable ways, thereby harnessing firms' considerable knowledge base about consumer behavior and redirecting the creative potential of the private sector.

  • A Unique Human Rights Law Database

    Professor Cesare Romano has launched a first-of-its-kind database that summarizes the decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.  By making these sophisticated and searchable summaries publicly available, Professor Romano and the students of the Loyola International & Comparative Law Review have profoundly expanded access to the decisions of this vital international tribunal for scholars and lawyers, with the aim of strengthening human rights law in the Americas.

  • Most-Cited IP Scholars

    Professors Jennifer Rothman and Lee Petherbridge were both named on these Most Cited IP Law Articles lists.

  • The Economics of the Bond Market

    Carlos Berdejó is an economist.  His recent research will appear in Revisiting the Voting Prohibition in Bond Workouts (forthcoming, Tulane), in which he evaluates the economic impact of the longstanding prohibition against collective action clauses (CACs) on the $250 billion U.S. bond market.  Through an innovative exercise in comparative law involving Chile, Brazil and Germany, he proposes a more efficient rule and offers new insights into the relative merits of mandatory and default contracting rules.

Our Faculty